"" Mental multivitamin




Established in October 2003 for readers, thinkers, and autodidacts
___________________________________________________________________________

ABOUT & DISCLOSURENIGHTSTANDPARENT-TEACHERBARDOLATRYBIRDINGARTBOOKSTOREGEAR


11.19.2009

Apparently, the Misses and I are the only ones looking forward to this evening's finale. If, in fact, the show was better in the past, we can't wait to see if the library has earlier seasons on DVD. Until then, we're going to "Make it work!"

Postscript: For the record, we're rooting for Carol Hannah. Irina's designs are also quite good, but... "Irina-ish" has become a non-too-flattering adjective around here. Heh, heh, heh.

Added later: Oh, the library does have the first five seasons of the series! The women of Family M-mv are doing a happy dance.

From the archives:
Uncharacteristic entry

Several years ago, I espied photo calendars in the dollar aisle of Michaels. Proud owner and occasional user of a quality color printer, I knew this would be a simple, nearly painless project that would yield gifts a couple of relatives might enjoy.

I was right.

Eventually, my color printer died a painful death at the hands of an errant plastic lizard wedged in the cartridge, so for a couple of years, I printed the photos on my laser jet printer. This probably sounds cheaper and tackier than it actually turned out. I'm not certain why it took me years to realize that I could simply download the photos to, say, Walgreens or Target, for photofinishing, but it did.

What can I say? I'm not crafty like that.

This year, however, I did download the photos -- thirteen color photos, one for each month and one to personalize the front (or back) -- and over the holiday, I assembled five calendars. Four are gifts.

Photofinishing at Walgreens: $12.35 *
Calendars from Michaels: $5 plus tax
Glue stick: $0.50
Envelopes to ship the gifts: approximately $3
Postage: unknown, but usually under $2 per padded envelope

So for less than $30, I've guaranteed four smiles this holiday season. Are you looking for simple, inexpensive gifts that either you or the kids can make? Check out the dollar baskets at Michaels, folks. Inexplicably, the calendars usually begin appearing sometime over the summer, but there may be some left. If not, make a note on your planning calendar: Check dollar bins at Michaels. Then you'll have 'em for next year.

Related and equally uncharacteristic entry here.
__________________

* Just before I sent the photos to Walgreens for this year's calendar, I googled "Walgreens coupon code photo" -- and ended up saving twenty percent on processing. Frugality is never a bad idea. Look for promotional codes, coupons, and other deals when shopping online.

11.17.2009

Oh, I cried, all right. I did. All of us did.

Spoiler alert.

But have our expectations sunk so abysmally low that a movie's greatness is now measured by the number of times it brings an audience to tears?

Yeah, like nearly everyone else in this rural-suburb hyphenated hybrid of a town we live in, we rented Up this weekend. While everyone else raves about it, though, plans to wrap it up for Christmas, I'm feeling a little a bit like a citizen looking at the emperor's new cloak -- that is, worried about having my head handed to me for speaking my mind.

The opening fifteen or so minutes represent a beautifully poignant, and, yes, emotionally mature animated sequence. Memorable. Truthful. Poetic. In fact, if this movie opened with that sequence, included the scenes in the construction area, concluded with the house ripping away from its foundation and borne away by balloons, and ran credits over an image of the house happily nestled atop the falls, I'd thoroughly understand all of the early Oscar buzz. It would be a sure bet for best animated short.

But it doesn't.

Up continues. Over a city, through a storm, and into South America. And there, while a dog you know was drawn with an eye to what an adorable stuffed toy it would make distracts you from the melancholy theme of dreams dashed and/or deferred, you wonder if you're the only one who can see that the emperor is only wearing a pair of stretched out Hanes underpants.

11.15.2009

"So get off your ath; let's do some math!" *

From "Who Needs Mathematicians for Math, Anyway?" (City Journal, November 13):
Those trying to overthrow the traditional curriculum found mathematics a hard nut to crack, however, because of the sequential nature of its content through the grades and its relationship to high school chemistry and physics. Nevertheless, education faculty eventually figured out how to reimagine the mathematics curriculum, too, so that it could march under the banner of social justice. As Alan Schoenfeld, the lead author of the high school standards in the 1989 NCTM report, put it, “the traditional curriculum was a vehicle for . . . the perpetuation of privilege.” The new approach would change all that.

Two theories lie behind the educators’ new approach to math teaching: “cultural-historical activity theory” and “constructivism.”



* From School of Rock

11.14.2009

Semicolon hosts "The Saturday Review of Books." Consider participating this week.

11.13.2009

(The continuing pursuit of) Fine Art (on) Friday

As I wrote last Friday, the Misses and I are studying the art of portraiture at the local college. We must be doing all right: Many of you were able to pick Tim Gunn, Theodore Roosevelt, and the First Lady out of our early efforts. So, the goggle-eyed fellow behind the thick glasses? Burgess Meredith in the "The Twilight Zone" episode "Time Enough at Last." And the clear-eyed man at the bottom of the mosaic? Richard Farnsworth.

This week, the class focused strictly on charcoal techniques. Here is my "inspiration image." What do you think?


I have found it to be true that the older I've become the better my life has become.
~ Doris Lessing

11.12.2009

"[T]he privilege of drinking a soupçon of pee is hardly a recommendation. "

Excerpts from Edward Champion's review of 2012:
■ There comes a point in any Roland Emmerich film in which anyone with a brain must give up and ponder why such superficialities remain a draw.

■ Here is a filmmaker so happy to whore himself out to product placement that the most important government representatives all use Vaio laptops.

■ And instead of Emmerich using his exploitative skills to make his audience think, he has produced the cinematic equivalent of an audience member running out of toilet paper when she most desperately needs it. His audience is doomed to run around the house with pants around legs, hoping to seek out a Kleenex or paper towel substitute and praying to the deities that nobody else is home.
Bookmark his site or add it to your reader, folks, because, unlike Emmerich, Ed does make his audience think.

11.10.2009

"Who should and shouldn't go to college?"

From "Are Too Many Students Going to College?":
With student debt rising and more of those enrolled failing to graduate in four years, there is a growing sentiment that college may not be the best option for all students.
Gee. No kidding.

Related entries
About college (first posted 11.16.2003)

Paying for college: A rant of modest proportions (first posted 5.20.2005)

11.08.2009

Quote of the day

All human situations have their inconveniences. We feel those of the present but neither see nor feel those of the future; and hence we often make troublesome changes without amendment, and frequently for the worse.
~ Benjamin Franklin

From our sketchbooks

As I mentioned on Friday, the Misses and I are enrolled in another art class at the local college. This semester we're learning about portraits, and I'm sure many of you will agree: Faces are hard. But we're learning. We're learning.

Added later: If you can identify the celebrities whose photos we used for inspiration, we'll know we're doing all right. (Hint: Three of them are deceased.)

11.07.2009

Semicolon hosts "The Saturday Review of Books." Consider participating this week.

11.06.2009

On the nightstand

He is home again, so this is a hasty entry.

Recently completed
Hamlet (John Marsden)
SFP at Pages Turned recommended this excellent retelling.

Await Your Reply (Don Chaon)
Recommended to those M-mv readers who appreciated Seven Types of Ambiguity (Elliot Perlman) as much as I did.

The Writing Class (Jincy Willett)
Perfectly entertaining. Equal parts well-paced mystery and cunningly written commentary. Willett wittily skewers the stereotypical cast of wannabes (including instructors) found in writing seminars -- found, in fact, in most continuing ed courses.

Currently reading
Secrets of a Buccaneer-Scholar (James Marcus Bach)
Subtitled "How Self-Education and the Pursuit of Passion Can Lead to a Lifetime of Success," this slim volume was penned by the son of Richard (Jonathan Livingston Seagull) Bach.

Stitches: A Memoir (David Small)
Related article here.

You'll find the complete "On the nightstand" archive here.

This post contains affiliate links. A purchase made through one of these links will earn this site a small referral fee. If applicable, advance reading copies (ARCs), review copies, and/or promotional copies are duly noted. For more information, see this site's disclosure statement.

Fine Art Friday

Alma Mahler (1913)
Charcoal, with stumping, laid down on cream wove paper
Oskar Kokoschka, English, born Austria (1886-1980)

Portrait of a Peasant Woman (1898-1899)
Charcoal on cream wove paper
Paula Modersohn-Becker, German (1876-1907)

We hadn't thought we would be able to find a spot in our schedule for an art class this fall, but we did, and this semester we're studying the art of portraiture at the local college. After spending the summer with watercolors (related entries here and here), we're working primarily in pencil and charcoal again (related entries here and here).

I'll share some of our work soon, but right now? I am distracted. A small female deer has crept under the autumn umbrella of low-hanging pine branches and sleeping brush that bounds the back yard. The Misses are captivated, and so, frankly, am I.

Course texts
Heads, Features and Faces (George B. Bridgman)
The Human Figure (John H. Vanderpoel)
Drawing: A Contemporary Approach (Teel Sale and Claudia Betti)

The "Fine Art Friday" archive can be found here.

11.02.2009

From the archives:
Just borrowing?

The following entry was posted six years ago today. I've updated some of the links.

Here's a compelling sliver of news — an article that, toward the end, manages to make (potential) plagiarists seem somewhat sympathetic. You see, once submitted to the site, the students' papers remain stored on the web as a further deterent against plagiarism, which, as one source in the article notes, "[A]nd that's a big worry I think."

Really? A worry? Which part? The part about our centers for higher learning being so rife with academic misconduct and dishonesty that professors are compelled to check every student's work for theft? Or the part where student-writers must essentially surrender their property to the Web?

Talk about your double-edged sword, huh? Academic integrity has disintegrated to the point where professors (who are not, it seems, above a little "sloppy scholarship" themselves; consider the recent case of Naval Academy history professor Brian VanDeMark) [new link] patronize a business that has reduced published work to "code," against which student papers can be compared to identify what amounts to theft of another writer's work.

And the other edge? Well, whether you're a student who thinks a little borrowing from here and there (especially if "here" is an obscure academic journal and "there" is a frat brother's cousin's sister's paper on the same topic) is A-okay or a student who triple-checks sources and attributions, once your papers are submitted to the California website, Turnitin.com, they (the papers) become a permanent part of the Web's landscape.

A conundrum, no?

I can see the headline now: "Potential plagiarists seek refuge in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act."

These are unwieldy issues to deal with in a short blog entry, I know, but I'll address this much: It's funny (and I don't mean, "funny, ha-ha funny") to me that most thinkers and readers can readily identify plagiarism when the words or ideas of one traditionally published writer are appropriated by another.

But when it comes to the Web, many of the same readers and thinkers have adopted an "oh-it's-just-borrowing" mentality that makes e-writers, website developers, photographers, artists, graphic designers, and others who make all or part of their living along the information superhighway shudder. An entire article is reprinted without permission there. Images are copied from here and used over there. Unique design elements of a new business' corporate identity program are diminished when cribbed by another business. Photographs for sale in an Web image gallery are copied and pasted into personal websites.

And so it goes.

Just borrowing? Um, can you say, "RIAA Strikes Back At Music Pirates in 2003"?

Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States [new link] seeks, among other things, "[t]o promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries."

Click here to learn how to avoid plagiarism of any kind.

"Narrative these days competes against incrementalized information -- data, chatter, noise."

From "The vestigial tale" (Washington Post, October 29):
Story-loving isn't just culture; it's biology. The human brain has evolved in such a way as to enable the construction and comprehension of narratives.

"We experience our lives in narrative form," says novelist Jonathan Franzen. "If you can't order things in a narrative fashion, your life is a chaotic bowl of mush."

[...]

Steven Pinker, Harvard's guru of evolutionary psychology, says our interest in stories comes in part from a "thirst for gossip" -- we need insider information about our social world. Narratives give gossip shape and meaning. And stories let us experiment, safely, with novel social arrangements that might otherwise blow up in our face.

10.31.2009

Fall behind

Did you know daylight saving time ends this Sunday at 2 a.m.? More information here: "Fall back -- time change is this weekend."

Related book
Spring Forward: The Annual Madness of Daylight Saving Time (Michael Downing)
Semicolon hosts "The Saturday Review of Books." Consider participating this week.

10.30.2009

Happy Halloween!

10.29.2009

“She wept, throughout her life, at the world’s refusal to conform to her ideal vision of it.”

From "Mrs. Logic" (New York Magazine, October 18):
It’s easy to chuckle at Rand, smugly, from the safe distance of intervening decades or an opposed ideology, but in person—her big black eyes flashing deep into the night, fueled by nicotine, caffeine, and amphetamines—she was apparently an irresistible force, a machine of pure reason, a free-market Spock who converted doubters left, right, and center. Eyewitnesses say that she never lost an argument. One of her young students (soon to be her young lover) staggered out of his first all-night talk session referring to her, admiringly, as “Mrs. Logic.” And logic, in Rand’s hands, seemed to enjoy superpowers it didn’t possess with anyone else.

10.28.2009

Culled from the archives:
Homeschooled students in fiction

In two (one, two) August 2008 entries, I recommended four excellent novels featuring homeschooled students. Some M-mv readers might find one or another of these titles a neat seasonal tie-in for their students, so here they are again:

Wendy Orr's Nim's Island
Read-aloud, five and up; read-alone, seven and up

Gordon Korman's Schooled
Read-aloud, eight and up; read-alone, nine and up
Related M-mv entry here.

Katherine Hannigan's Ida B.
Read-aloud, eight and up; read-alone, nine and up

Jerry Spinelli's Stargirl
Read-aloud/read-alone, twelve and up

10.27.2009

Homeschooling expert? Nah.

I am always startled by e-mail messages from homeschooling parents seeking my counsel, advice, and, as one correspondent put it, "expertise."

Folks, I am no expert. True, I've been doing this for a while -- twelve years, three months, to be exact. And, yes, I have already graduated one student.

But, "homeschooling expert"? Nah.

Do I have a few tips? Sure. And I provide them, here and here... and there... and there. Well, okay, here's a whole passel of tips, if you really want 'em. I've even tried to provide accounts -- real-time (here and here) and stream-of-consciousness -- of our reading, thinking, learning, living days.

It's not enough, some correspondents protest. More. Tell more. What program? What schedule? How? When? Where?
________________________

Once upon a time ago, a colleague and I were working on yet another Very Important Project (Rush! Rush! Hurry! Hurry!) using a program called Ventura. Other publishing professionals may remember this package. It was a behemoth, but, oh, if you could harness even a bit of its power... the places you could go! Anyway, as always, one or another junior attorney in the firm was strutting and fretting in the hall beyond our suite. "What are you doing? When will it be done? Can't you hurry? How do you do that?"

In his carefully cultivated "affable mid-Westerner" style, my colleague replied, "You know what, man? It's like sausage. You really don't want to know how it's made. In fact, if you saw how it was made, you would never eat sausage again."

If you saw how it was made, you would never eat sausage again.

Yeah, I think that about describes how I feel when I field yet another request for a homeschooling how-to tutorial. Heh, heh, heh.

Look. I'm not willfully withholding information. I've been blunt, direct, and transparent.

We read.

We think.

We learn.

We go out into the world and work, play, and live.

What more can I say?
________________________

Perhaps I'm not prepared to provide a conventional how-to tutorial because so much of what I did and what I do is intuitive and specific to me, to my students, and to my family. Besides, describing what we do any more than I already have would be a hellava a whole lot like trying to teach that junior attorney some Ventura "basics."

If you saw how it was made, you would never eat sausage again.
________________________

Last month, I read a thought-provoking article on the subject of experts. Two passages struck me. This one:
We are advised to seek and heed to advice of a bewildering chorus of personal experts -- parenting specialists, life coaches, relationship gurus, super-nannies and sex therapists, to name a few -- who apparently possess the authority to tell us how to live our lives.
And this:
While this professionalisation of everyday life has been a distinct trend from the outset of modernity, it has grown at a breathtaking pace since the 1960s, with professionals systematically expanding the range of personal issues that demand expert knowledge. Today, every aspect of life from birth through to school and career to marriage and mourning is subject professional counselling.
While I do think the homeschooling endeavor could benefit from a little more -- for lack of a better word -- professionalism (i.e., the adoption of some of the traits that make us successful in our more conventional work) -- I never bought into the idea of professional motherhood that columnist Anne Quindlen once excoriated. (M-mv entry here; column here.) Critics of homeschooling often accuse us of professionalizing everyday life, though; of, in fact, professionalizing motherhood. And frankly? I understand that accusation. While it is not what prompted my decision, I certainly realize that homeschooling seems to have conferred some -- again, for lack of better word -- status on my choices. Many people maintain that stay-at-home parenting alone does not draw on the education and work experience one has acquired, but they concede that home education may. A little, anyway. (Either that, or they simply dis and dismiss homeschooling parents and their students, which is a topic quite apart from the ideas I'm exploring here, isn't it?)

I'm hoping we can, for now, sidestep the philosophical exploration the previous paragraph begs (i.e., "What do I care what other people think?"). It will add nothing to this entry. Moving on, then.

The family-centered learning project does, indeed, benefit from and draw on the knowledge gained from my studies and work. While a degree may not be necessary to be a good teacher, I cannot, will not understate the role my own education -- which includes a graduate degree and postgraduate studies -- has played in my teaching. More, I firmly believe that the quality of an education system cannot exceed the quality of its teachers and that the quality of teachers affects student performance more than anything else. Folks bristle at such assertions, but they keep writing to me: More. Tell more. Don't become angry, then, when I tell you. My education -- and, yes, my work -- shaped me, shaped the way I receive and convey information, shaped my idea of what an agile mind comprises, so when I found myself in the most important teaching gig I'll ever have, I knew I was shaping my students, shaping the way they received and conveyed information, shaping their idea of what an agile mind comprises. I did so responsibly, not with the objective of providing a good elementary, intermediate, or secondary education but with the goal of growing lifelong learners.

Simply put, then, I have ensured that my students can read widely and deeply, write clearly, and think well.

Critics have also accused homeschooling parents of selfishness and self-centeredness, saying that we do what we do to serve needs of our own, not those of our children. I am guilty of one count of this charge, and this is it: I have selfishly spent the last twelve-plus years molding the sort of readers, thinkers, writers, and students that I sought in my classrooms and workshops once upon a time ago: Inquisitive. Well read. Versed in culture, both of the capital-C and the popular variety. At once thoughtful and challenging. Clear spoken. Confident. Mature. And so on.

While I appreciate the child-like, the childish leaves me cold, so I discarded conventional ideas about grades and age-level appropriateness and what every child needs to know, ignored most of the educational and homeschooling "experts," and simply gave my students the books, conversations, challenges, opportunities, time, resources, and all required to meet my ideal as quickly and effectively as possible.

The average child is capable of so much more than is typically asked of him or her! He need not be "scary smart" to understand Shakespeare in elementary school. She need not be "gifted" to move quickly through three levels of math. In an environment in which the tools of study are readily available, in a classroom in which the students have been led to understand that this -- all of this reading, thinking, learning, discussing, studying, creating, working, and, yes, playing -- is their job, in a school in which the teacher can, in fact, teach, damn it, there will be much profitable learning.

It's just hard to describe what's happening in such a classroom because it will be unique to that environment, those students, that teacher.

Moreover, folks become intensely uncomfortable when you tell them that, yes, seventh- and eighth-graders can understand college rhetoric, psychology, history, and logic texts. Sure, eleven- and thirteen-year-olds can enroll in college courses. Of course, ten-year-olds can attend museum lecture series. Hell, yeah, a student can do work he loves and earn good grades and graduate from high school with many college credits on his transcript. Certainly, 1.5 hours of music practice daily is possible. And why wouldn't they be able to join a sports team?

They become even more uncomfortable when you assert that your students are quite normal, really. Each has strengths, weaknesses, talents, flaws. But they have been asked to do what they are capable of doing -- regardless of their age -- every. single. day. by a teacher who embraces the idea of a lifetime of excellence. No matter what else life may demand.

It's really that simple.

And, yes, that difficult.

Like working with the 1995 edition of Ventura.

Or making sausage.
________________________

Since most homeschooling parents were products of conventional schooling, many remain caught between two false ideas: (1) that simply because they homeschool, their kids are somehow better positioned for success and (2) that learning must be keyed to certain grades, levels, ages.

Elsewhere, I've already explored how far off the mark the first idea is, but the second... well, that brings us back to the tyranny of experts, I think -- back to all of the e-mail messages asking me, What program? What schedule? How? When? Where? As if I possess the authority to tell someone else what to teach her own child. As if, even if I possessed the authority, the expertise, that what I've done here is replicable, that it would work elsewhere.

But I am no expert on the subject of homeschooling, so I won't add my voice to the "bewildering chorus" telling you which grammar book, reading list, math schedule, foreign language, lab science, etc.

More, I'm not even an advocate of homeschooling. I'm not. Really.

All I can and will say is this: Make your own sausage. My recipe is a family secret. It begins with parenting them well. After that, well, you're on your own.

10.26.2009

From the archives (6.14.2005):
The little things

The little things -- the four-leaf clovers and the crooked hearts in the summer sand.

They accrue like the interest on your someday-maybe savings account in the neighborhood bank. Slowly, steadily.

The little things -- the early-morning exclamations over new visitors to the feeder and the later-evening chorus of "I love you!"

They grow in your heart, swell like those funny, flat sponges you won at the Fourth of July fair once-upon-a-time ago.

Oh, the little things.

They crowd out worry and doubt. And fear. And they leave only the full feeling of loving and being loved.

The little things.

10.24.2009

Semicolon hosts "The Saturday Review of Books." Consider participating this week.

10.23.2009

"I wear it for a memorable honour...."

As I wrote in this entry, Act 4, Scene III of Kenneth Branagh's Henry V wins my vote as "Most Moving."

Will you be joining Family M-mv on Sunday?

10.22.2009

"This story shall the good man teach his son...."

From Asimov's Guide to Shakespeare:
According to a legend which can be traced back no further than the eighth century, Crispin and Crispian were two brothers, Christian, living in Rome. They fled the persecution of Christians begun under the Roman Emperor Diocletian. They traveled to Soissons in what was then Gaul (later France), and there they remained in hiding, supporting themselves as shoemakers. In 286 they were found and beheaded, presumably on October 25, which became their day of commemoration. They were the patron saints of shoemakers and their day was particularly celebrated in France. And it was on October 25, 1415, that the Battle of Agincourt was to be fought.
Yes, this coming Sunday, October 25, is "call'd the feast of Crispian." Why not plan to join Family M-mv in the celebration? (Virtually, of course!) Rent, borrow, or buy Kenneth Branagh's Henry V. Air-pop some popcorn. Watch, think, learn, discuss... enjoy.

If Sunday will be your younger set's first brush with Harry -- or even Shakespeare -- you might appreciate the following M-mv entries:

"I was not angry since I came to France / Until this instant...." (11.04.2007)

Shakespeare. Yes, again. And again. (9.30.2006)

(Other bardolatry entries are collected here.)
_________________________________

From Act IV, Scene III of Shakespeare's Henry V:

King Henry:
This story shall the good man teach his son;
And Crispin Crispian shall ne'er go by,
From this day to the ending of the world,
But we in it shall be remembered,
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers.
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition;
And gentlemen in England now a-bed
Shall think themselves accurs'd they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin's day.

And here is a clip from the film, a harbinger of the great treat in store for you this Sunday.

10.21.2009

"The new brevity has many virtues."

From "Three Tweets for the Web" (Wilson Quarterly, Autumn 2009):
Another way the Web has affected the human attention span is by allowing greater specialization of knowledge. It has never been easier to wrap yourself up in a long-term intellectual project without at the same time losing touch with the world around you. Some critics don’t see this possibility, charging that the Web is destroying a shared cultural experience by enabling us to follow only the specialized stories that pique our individual interests. But there are also those who argue that the Web is doing just the opposite—that we dabble in an endless variety of topics but never commit to a deeper pursuit of a specific interest. These two criticisms contradict each other. The reality is that the Internet both aids in knowledge specialization and helps specialists keep in touch with general trends.

My little researching and writing f(r)iend returns.

About two years ago, I deleted M-mv's site meters, a move I explained in this entry. Because the data collected with such tools may contribute to the success of two upcoming writing projects, I have reinstalled one meter.

Also, to the gentle reader who "found" my Twitter account: As I explained in the sidebar, I don't tweet, but I wanted to claim the name.

10.20.2009

Get your geek on!

geek VERB

1. To love, to enjoy, to celebrate, to have an intense passion for.
2. To express interest in.
3. To possess a large amount of knowledge in.
4. To promote.

I geek

books

backyard birding

bicycling

■ art (studying and creating)

Shakespeare

writing

... and so much more.

What do you geek?

Remember: Whatever you geek, the library supports it all. So geek the library, okay? Learn more at GeektheLibrary.org.

HT: So Many Books.

Project Feederwatch

Helping birds is easy.

1. Put up a feeder.
2. Count the birds that visit.
3. Send the data to scientists.

The 2009-2010 season of Project FeederWatch begins November 1, so it's not too late to register for this wonderful program.

From the Project FeederWatch website:
Project FeederWatch is a winter-long survey of birds that visit feeders at backyards, nature centers, community areas, and other locales in North America. FeederWatchers periodically count the highest numbers of each species they see at their feeders from November through early April. FeederWatch helps scientists track broadscale movements of winter bird populations and long-term trends in bird distribution and abundance.

Project FeederWatch is operated by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology and Bird Studies Canada.

Your counts will help scientists monitor changes in feeder bird populations. New participants receive a research kit with easy to follow instructions, the FeederWacther's handbook, a bird-identification poster, a calendar, and a subscription to the newsletter of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology (U.S.) or Bird Studies Canada (Canada). For more information or to sign up in the U.S., please visit this site or call (800) 843-2473; if in Canada, please visit this site or call (888) 448-2473. A $15 fee ($35 in Canada) makes the program possible.
If you plan to participate, set up your feeders now and commit to keeping them filled throughout the season. Use a variety of feeders and seed to attract a greater variety of visitors. For more information, check out this site.

More on M-mv's adventures in birding here.

Intellectual polygamy

From "The Last Days of the Polymath" (Intelligent Life, Autumn 2009):
The word “polymath” teeters somewhere between Leo­nardo da Vinci and Stephen Fry. Embracing both one of history’s great intellects and a brainy actor, writer, director and TV personality, it is at once presumptuous and banal. Djerassi doesn’t want much to do with it. “Nowadays people that are called polymaths are dabblers—are dabblers in many different areas,” he says. “I aspire to be an intellectual polygamist. And I deliberately use that metaphor to provoke with its sexual allusion and to point out the real difference to me between polygamy and promiscuity."
Do you know (of) an actual polymath? Not just a dabbler but a bona fide member of that now endangered species? If so, join the conversation at Language Log: No Respect.

10.18.2009

From the archives:
The recommended daily allowance

M-mv's birthday celebration continues.
This entry first appeared nearly six years ago.

One of my strongest-held beliefs is that no one should ever finish a book that [he] is not enjoying, no matter how popular or well reviewed. Believe me, nobody is going to get any points in heaven by slogging [his] way through a book [he isn't] enjoying but think[s] [he] ought to read. I live by what I call the "rule of fifty," which acknowledges that time is short, and the world of books is immense. If you're fifty years old or younger, give a book about fifty pages before you decide to commit yourself to reading it, or give up. If you're over fifty, which is when time gets even shorter, subtract your age from 100 — the result is the number of pages you should read before deciding.
Nancy Pearl may be the world's most famous librarian. She received a lot of ink in this summer and early fall when her likeness was used to develop a librarian action figure. But her idea for the "If All of Seattle Read the Same Book" program, which has been adopted in cities around the world (e.g., One Book, One Chicago), is her greatest achievement.

The quoted passage appears in the introduction to Book Lust, Pearl's book recommendations "for every mood, moment, and reason." Pearl is not a particularly good writer, but she is engaging (primarily because of her profound love of books and reading), and her recommendations are generally top-drawer.

10.15.2009

From the archives (3.20.2004)
(Behind the scenes) at the museum

A message about "Mental multivitamin" was posted in another forum. The topic may interest some of our regular readers, so portions are excerpted here (boldface).

I enjoyed reading your "On the nightstand" entry in your un-blog. I was interested in how you coordinate your museum / reading / history subjects. My questions are probably many layered and I will try to express them as clearly and orderly as possible! But any additional info that you think would be helpful (especially as you get the feel of my questions) would be greatly appreciated.

First, how do you know what is up and coming at the museums?


We're members of several museums (and one zoo!) in or near the city and receive publications (usually quarterly), email updates, and event mailings for these. Most of the museums maintain websites, too, which I consult for up-to-the-minute information. Membership in some museums has resulted in our names being sold to the membership offices of other museums (parks, arboretums, etc.), so we regularly receive mail announcing this or that new exhibit or feature at places not on our "regular circuit."

I live in the DC area and the sheer number of museums and exhibits and opportunities can be overwhelming. What do you look for when considering multiple opportunities?

Appeal. Interest. Convenience. Cost (if applicable).

Second, do you look for specific exhibits to match what your subjects are for the year? Can you get a schedule far enough in advance to plan a study around the exhibit? Do you consider your trips "extra" in that they don't have to tie into any subject but just be interesting to you and your children?

Like you, we live in a museum-rich city. It's not hard to find exhibits, programs, and classes to complement history and lit reading, to say nothing of finding exhibits, programs, and classes to complement science studies. As I mentioned above, most museums publish monthly or quarterly newsletters and/or event calendars and maintain websites, so, yes, I can plan a study unit around a special exhibit, as I did when the Einstein exhibit visited the Field.

I can also look ahead and say, "Oh! Child #1 will be studying astronomy this year. I wonder what courses the Adler is offering." Or, "Ah! Children #2 and #3 want to study praying mantises. Let's head to the Peggy Notebaert Nature Museum to see them before ordering the egg case." (An aside: I am so glad I did. The mantises were bigger than #2 and #3 realized. They opted for an ant hill instead.)

Then again, many trips are simply "extra," as you put it, as, for example, our plans to attend the Rembrandt exhibit at the Art Institute. We love the AIC, Rembrandt's work appeals to all of us, and we have identified several excellent resources to read and study before our planned visit. Voilà! An "extra."

We live here in this city because of the number, variety, and accessibility of its cultural and educational treasures — the museums, libraries, parks, theaters, learning centers, etc. Our family makes more than a dozen or more field trips per month. Less than half of those are specifically tied to a subject "requirement" or a "master plan" — beyond, that is, the plan that says, "We live here so that we can do this. Let's!"

Also, do you do anything to "round out" your visits — drawings, papers, books read about the subject, etc.? What is helpful to do prior to a visit and what is good to do after? I would like to do something that would prepare my children for the visit and help cement the trip into the children's minds after we get home.

Oh, yes! Your instincts are spot on. By all means, read books about the subject before your visit (if applicable). Make journal entries as you wander through the museum. (Sketch pads work well for the pre-writing set. Heck, sketch pads work well for me, especially at the zoo, nature centers and museums, and Art Institute.) If appropriate (and permitted), provide the children with disposable cameras to record the trip. Have them make a collage or scrapbook of the adventure. Encourage older children to choose a particular topic in which to become expert. Ask them to present the topic either in advance of or following the museum visit. Put an older child in charge of the floor plan/map; allow him to navigate the family tour.

You get the idea: It's not you the parent ushering the children through intimidating halls of treasures. It's your family having an adventure in one of the greatest places on earth. As Coach Chaney always says, "Winning is an attitude!" Well, parenting, teaching... they are, too. Cop the right attitude, and there you go.

Lastly, thank you for the thoughts and perspectives you share on this board and on M-mv. I have been challenged in my own ideas about education — the whys and hows. Your obvious enjoyment of your children rings a familiar tune within my own heart. A tune I trust my children hear loud and clear everyday.

I'm betting they do hear it.
____________________________________

Some final thoughts on museums and children (not directed to A., who posted the museum questions):

I can't tell you how many times one or another parent has parried, "Oh, well, it's all fine for them to talk museums, but my children are younger. No way they're going to enjoy a wander through the museum," to my descriptions of one or another of our adventures. Well, our two youngest have been accompanying us on "field trips" since they were six weeks old. The getting there, the being there, and the returning home have been a part of their life rhythm for so long that it's second nature. If you want children to enjoy museums, you must take children to museums.

My best advice?

Plan short trips. Leave the stroller at home. Why? Because life in a stroller is dull. It hurts the bum, and the view from there, well, it stinks. Try it sometime. Visit a museum and squat beside the stroller. See how much you see... or don't. Instead, put infants in backpack carriers. Let walkers walk. You'll move more slowly, yes, but so what? I am always made tired by the tourists and suburbanites at the Shedd and Adler and Field and MSI, etc. who zip from one exhibit to another, urging their children to, Hurry up, let's go here, don't you want to see this? Of course, they want to see. That's why they're standing still right there. Yes, I do understand. Admission (when one doesn't have a membership) is pricey; the trip is often long; and they only have one day in which to do it all.

But better to do a few wonderful things slowly and memorably than to try and fail to do it all quickly, no? If you doubt that I mean this, let me confide that this is precisely the philosophy we maintained when we visited D.C. Our two youngest were then just three and four. We had an amazing time doing a few things well — slowly, enjoyably, in a way that makes all of us want to return. You don't get that when you zip-zap-zoom. Life is too short, folks argue. We agree. Slow down and enjoy some of it because speeding up will not allow you to see more or do more. It will only make you, well, tired.

10.13.2009

And now we are six.

As I mentioned yesterday, Mental multivitamin is six years old this month. (Related aside: And my oldest child is twenty this month; my youngest, twelve.)

You know, I've always maintained that Mental multivitamin was established for readers, thinkers, and autodidacts. But, really? It was established for me. Born during a respite between teaching and working, it was and is an attempt to write across the "curriculum" of this reader-thinker-autodidact; to synthesize what I am learning about astronomy and history and ornithology and current events and literature and technology and art and, yes, about myself, my family, and the world.

In short, I write Mental multivitamin to learn, to know.

Like so many students before me, though, self-taught and otherwise, I have realized that learning, done well, only expands one's awareness of all he doesn't know, of all he has yet to learn. It is, then, the yen to know, and therefore to learn more, that propels me forward, like an ass lunging for that ever-beyond-reach carrot: one book to another book -- or play or painting or museum or film or concert or endeavor or whatever.

Because I am a home educator, it might be noble (or at least prudent and politic) to say that I do what I do to model for my children the sort of behavior I wish to cultivate in them. But in fact, I do what I do because I am compelled to do it. Ass is to Carrot as I am to Autodidactic Pursuits. Providing the children with an example of academic tenacity -- no matter the nature of one's gifts -- has just been a happy byproduct of my studies.

Another byproduct -- for me, for them -- has been an ever-deepening appreciation for that scholarly "trinity" at work (and at play) in the reading-thinking-learning-writing (to know) life: sychronicity, serendipity, and synthesis. Sometimes, the observation of one or the other will lead to a post; other times, posting leads to the observation. No matter. An epiphany is an epiphany. I'll take it, however it comes.

So, happy birthday, M-mv. Here's to readers, thinkers, and autodidacts; to asses and their carrots; to me.

10.12.2009

On the nightstand

Recently completed
With the Misses
The Vermeer Interviews: Conversations with Seven Works of Art (Bob Raczka)
As regular M-mv readers know, the Misses and I read Chasing Vermeer for the Summer 2009 incarnation of our "Girls Rule Book Club." As always, one book led to another. (Wash. Rinse. Repeat.) For more about the synchronicity and serendipity that define the reading life, revisit this recent M-mv entry about the connections between literature, art, and, well, life: Slow down. Look. See with your mind.

Betsy-Tacy (Maud Hart Lovelace)
As I shared with Melissa, I actually read this sweet story to the Misses many years ago... but they did not remember Betsy! Uh-oh. But what a wonderful way to join the celebration, then: revisiting the gently told introduction to the series. Now the Misses plan to watch Betsy grow up.

The Wretched Stone (Chris Van Allsburg)
Mental multivitamin is six years old this month. My very first entry concerned the Great American Campfire, so it delighted me to share this book -- recommended in Rafe Esquith's Lighting Their Fires (a recent RDA) -- with the Misses.

Serendipity. Synchronicity.

And a related aside: Family M-mv met Chris Van Allsburg seven years ago. The story is recounted in this entry.

Much Ado about Nothing (Shakespeare)
All of the bardolatry entries are collected here.

For pleasure
What Now? (Ann Patchett)
M-mv chapbook entry here.

A Gate at the Stairs (Lorrie Moore)
Related M-mv entry here.

The Miles Between (Mary E. Pearson)
I picked this up on Book Moot's recommendation.

The Other Daughter (Lisa Gardner)
Yes, it was like reading television... and that's all right. Once in a while. Especially when one is spending as much time as I am steeping herself in the rules and regulations of swimming. (I passed the exam (first mentioned in this entry) and was made an official in August. My first meet is later this month. Wish me -- and the swimmers! -- luck.)

Non-fiction pursuits
Smart Moves: Why Learning Is Not All in Your Head (Carla Hannaford)

Bal-A-Vis-X : Rhythmic Balance/Auditory/Vision eXercises for Brain and Brain-Body Integration (Bill Hubert)

Brain Gym: Simple Activities for Whole Brain Learning (Paul F. Dennison)

Brain Gym for Business: Instant Brain Boosters for On-the-Job Success (Gail E. Dennison)

Next up?
The Woman in Black (Susan Hill)
I picked this up in February and have moved it up on the TBR pile, thanks to Pages Turned.

John Brown's Body (A.L. Barker)
Another Pages Turned suggestion.

Johnny Tremain (Esther Forbes)
With the Misses M-mv.

10.10.2009

"[D]isorientation begets creative thinking."

From "How Nonsense Sharpens the Intellect" (NYT, October 5):
Brain-imaging studies of people evaluating anomalies, or working out unsettling dilemmas, show that activity in an area called the anterior cingulate cortex spikes significantly. The more activation is recorded, the greater the motivation or ability to seek and correct errors in the real world, a recent study suggests. “The idea that we may be able to increase that motivation,” said Dr. Inzlicht, a co-author, “is very much worth investigating.”

Semicolon hosts "The Saturday Review of Books." Consider participating this week.

10.08.2009

Nobody's fool

From Michael Dirda's essay "These Foolish Things":
In Shakespearean comedies (and tragedies) you’re certainly smart to play the Professional Fool or clown. When Bottom the Weaver is “translated” into an ass, the very symbol of the fool, what happens? The gorgeous Titania leads him away for some quality time in her bower. Hamlet knows that with his “antic disposition” on, he can do or say whatever he’d like. There’s no need to act the conventional young intellectual like his earnest schoolmate Horatio, who probably wears a bow tie and always makes the dean’s list at Wittenberg. As for the late Yorick, that fellow of infinite jest was obviously the only person at the gloomy court of Denmark who ever brought a spark of joy into the life of the melancholy Dane: “He hath borne me on his back a thousand times!” Even the greatest of all Shakespearean characters, Falstaff, is essentially a fool writ very, very large. Wherever Sir John goes, it’s party time, Carnival, and he is the Lord of Misrule. Certainly this jolly fat man is a lot better company than, say, the rather cold-hearted and manipulative Prospero. But even that magician finally decides to drown his book and give up his power. Being superhuman isn’t half as much fun as being human.

10.07.2009

From the "Worth repeating" files:
When other homeschoolers "fail"

This entry was first posted on 3.29.2007. It is reposted here with minor changes.

Elsewhere, the idea of inept or failing homeschoolers was discussed at length, particularly the comparison between traditionally schooled and homeschooled students, standards for homeschoolers, and the failure of some homeschooling families to deliver a certain type of education.

My response to the many issues raised in that discussion follows.

Illinois law mentions providing an education in English comparable to that of same-aged peers in public schools. That's about it. Oh, and it lists the number of days required, too, I think.

There's a word or two, probably not terribly kind, for people like me, but I'll risk hearing the criticism again. Here goes: One of the reasons I homeschool is that I'm not terribly interested in what everyone else is doing -- how woefully underprepared Suzy Homeschool's kids are, how inarticulate Peggy Publicschool's kids are, etc.

Really. Not. Interested.

I'm concerned about the progress of three kids, for now. Hey, look at that. They all live here.

I am most decidedly not a homeschooling evangelist -- I do not think home education is the answer to all that ails our public school classrooms. Part of the reason that I won't evangelize or play the role of plump homeschooling mom-cheerleader is that I'm not on-board with the homeschool "party line" -- that is, that simply because the kids are homeschooled, they are better prepared than their traditionally schooled peers.

What. Bosh.

Why, there were (and likely, continue to be) huge gaps in the consistency, rigor, and quality of education being provided to the children of the posters on the sole homeschooling message board I once visited, let alone across the ever-expanding ranks of homeschoolers in this country. I can only speak to the studies of, oh, yeah, three students, and I can do so using both conventional standards (e.g., test scores and awards) and less conventional (e.g., reading lists, perhaps, or their conduct).

That's all I'm going to do, then -- speak to their experience, no one else's.

The fact that we homeschool is among the very last things that we share with people. As a matter of fact, if I can avoid revealing it, let alone discussing it, I will. As I've said here and elsewhere many, many times before, I'm not interested in educating the public about homeschooling, I'm bored by idle and small chatter, and I loathe the pigeonhole into which my family is filed once folks learn we homeschool. Sorry. None of the stereotypes apply here, and I'd rather not have my children labor under the smallmindedness of others, so I don't advertise how they are educated.

I let their clear speech, many conventional achievements (work, academic awards and prizes, sports-oriented successes, etc.), and their good natures speak to their intelligence and scholastic preparation. That should be more than enough.

And I just don't worry about what everyone else is doing.

Homeschooled students are already bound by the standards of state law. I do not believe homeschools should be subject to regulation beyond that which a private school would be subjected. Period. No matter how the students are prepared.

The discussion began with a number of questions, among them, How do I feel when I meet homeschoolers whose kids are obviously not on a par with public schooled students of the same age/grade? Um, the same way I feel when I meet the parents of public or private schooled or, for that matter, homeschooled students whose kids are not as articulate, interested, adjusted, etc. as my own -- "Wow. Thank goodness I don't have to spend much time with these people." What else am I supposed to think? Really? I'm not a people person even in the best of circumstances. (That appears to be a nature thing, by the way. The children are the kindest, most gracious humans I have ever met.) In the worst (e.g., in the company of parents whose children make me cringe with more than curmudgeonly bad humor), I just seek the nearest exit.

Related aside: When I started homeschooling in August 1997, one of my oft-repeated sentences was that I had no intention of sacrificing my children on the altar of public education while I labored (volunteered, fund-raised, etc.) for the neighborhood schools like a Missy Goodcitizen. Well, a dozen years later, I would add that I have no intention of sacrificing them on the altar of homeschooling stereotypes and myths, either.

You do your thing; I'll do mine. Let's see how that all works out, then, eh?
_____________________

For more of M-mv's thoughts on education and parenting, see the posts collected here.

10.06.2009

Chapbook entry


The Impostor's Daughter (Laurie Sandell)


p. 229-230
Did I plan to live the rest of my life as a bitter, angry woman-child, perpetually seeking answers for the crimes of my childhood, or was I going to let it go?

I wanted to let it go. I needed to let it go. In that moment, that meant taking my father's response at face value.

It meant accepting him for who he was, then and now. It meant realizing it didn't matter what his motivations were, as long as I didn't allow him to continue to hurt me.

Pretending actually worked.